![]()
Certificate: View Certificate
Published Paper PDF: Download PDF
Confirmation Letter: View
Jyoti
Research Scholar
Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics
University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Prof B. W. Pandey
Professor
Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics
University of Delhi, Delhi, India
ABSTRACT
Geographical Indications (GIs) have become an important means of protecting products that owe their character to a particular place. They guard traditional producers against imitation, help them earn a fair return for distinctive goods, and keep alive the knowledge and skills on which those goods depend. For remote mountain regions with few other competitive advantages, a GI can also link local livelihoods to wider markets. India gave legal force to this form of protection through the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, and 697 GIs have been registered in the country by 2025.
Himachal Pradesh holds 11 registered GIs, including Basmati, which it shares with other northern states, covering handicrafts, agricultural produce and a manufactured good from five districts. This study traces the evolution of GI recognition in the state. It examines the Kinnauri Shawl as a detailed case study. Using a descriptive-analytical approach based on GI Registry records, government gazetteers and field observation, it explores how the high altitude, rain-shadow aridity, long winters and isolation of Kinnaur have shaped the materials, production calendar and design of the shawl, and how indigenous knowledge, high-altitude pastoralism and Buddhist-Hindu symbolism have given it a distinct cultural identity.
The results show that GI registration has given formal recognition to the geographical and cultural distinctiveness of products from across the state. In the case of the Kinnauri Shawl, it has strengthened legal protection, but its benefits for weavers depend on wider producer participation, effective quality control, a secure supply of local wool and better access to markets. The paper concludes by proposing policy interventions in these areas to help GI protection support heritage conservation and rural livelihoods in Himalayan regions.
Keywords: Geographical Indications, Kinnauri Shawl, Traditional Knowledge, Himachal Pradesh, Intellectual Property, Cultural Heritage, High-Altitude Pastoralism, Climate,
REFERENCES
Acharya, R. M. (1982). Sheep and goat breeds of India (FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 30). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Barham, E. (2003). Translating terroir: The global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9
Bérard, L., & Marchenay, P. (2006). Local products and geographical indications: Taking account of local knowledge and biodiversity. International Social Science Journal, 58(187), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2006.00592.x
Bhattacharya, N. S. (Ed.). (2022). Geographical indication protection in India: The evolving paradigm. Springer.
Blakeney, M. (2014). The protection of geographical indications: Law and practice. Edward Elgar.
Central Ground Water Board. (2013). Ground water information booklet: Kinnaur District, Himachal Pradesh. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India. https://cgwb.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-10/kinnaur.pdf
Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. (2025). Geographical Indications Registry [Database]. Government of India. https://ipindia.gov.in
Das, K. (2010). Prospects and challenges of geographical indications in India. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 13(2), 148–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00369.x
Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, No. 48, Acts of Parliament, 1999 (India).
Ghosh, J., Banerji, O., Samanta, N., & Bhargava, A. (2025). Geographical indication (GI) laws in India and its implementation: A critical appraisal. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 30(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v30i3.9953
Government of Himachal Pradesh. (2022). District gazetteer: Kinnaur. Department of Language and Culture.
Government of India. (2008). Kinnauri shawl (GI Application No. 149). Geographical Indications Registry. https://search.ipindia.gov.in/GIRPublicSearch/Application/Details/149
Handa, O. C. (2017). Indo-Tibetan wool politics. The Himalayan Journal, 72. https://www.himalayanclub.org/hj/72/7/indo-tibetan-wool-politics/
McDonald, B. J., Hoey, W. A., & Hopkins, P. S. (1987). Cyclical fleece growth in cashmere goats. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 38(3), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9870597
Panda, P. (2016). Protection of geographical indication in India. International Journal of Scientific Research, 5(3), 237–238. https://www.worldwidejournals.com/international-journal-of-scientific-research-(IJSR)/recent_issues_pdf/2016/March/March_2016_1492751512__73.pdf
Rangnekar, D. (2004). The socio-economics of geographical indications: A review of empirical evidence from Europe (UNCTAD-ICTSD Issue Paper No. 8). International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
Suttie, J. M., & Reynolds, S. G. (Eds.). (2003). Transhumant grazing systems in temperate Asia (FAO Plant Production and Protection Series No. 31). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Vandecandelaere, E., Arfini, F., Belletti, G., & Marescotti, A. (2010). Linking people, places and products: A guide for promoting quality linked to geographical origin and sustainable geographical indications (2nd ed.). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & SINER-GI.
World Trade Organization. (1995). Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPS Agreement). https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htm