![]()
Kavya Menon
Independent Researcher
Karnataka, India
Abstract
Over the period 1995–2015, English-Medium Instruction (EMI) experienced rapid expansion in rural Maharashtra’s schooling landscape, driven by national and state education policies that prioritized English proficiency as a vehicle for socio-economic mobility. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of stakeholder attitudes toward EMI in five rural districts, examining perceptions held by students, teachers, and parents. Employing a stratified survey of 200 participants, supplemented by thematic analysis of open-ended responses, the research investigates perceived cognitive, cultural, and logistical impacts of EMI adoption. Quantitative findings indicate that a majority of students (72%) and parents (68%) view EMI as essential for future academic and career success, yet many report comprehension difficulties when complex concepts are taught in English. Teachers, while acknowledging the long-term benefits of English fluency, express concerns over inadequate training and resource constraints. Qualitative themes highlight “language anxiety,” “resource scarcity,” and “cultural displacement,” underscoring tensions between aspirational goals and on-the-ground realities. The study concludes that a calibrated bilingual approach—integrating Marathi scaffolding with gradual English immersion—combined with targeted teacher professional development and context-appropriate materials, can optimize learning outcomes without sacrificing mother-tongue competence. Recommendations are offered for policymakers, school administrators, and teacher-training institutes to collaboratively design EMI frameworks that are pedagogically sound, culturally sensitive, and sustainable in resource-limited rural settings.
Keywords
English-Medium Instruction, Rural Education, Maharashtra, Stakeholder Attitudes, Bilingual Pedagogy
References
- Bali, A., & Ramanathan, V. (2005). Linguistic diversity and bilingual education in India: Policy, issues, and practices. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 26(5), 409–426.
- Desai, S. (2003). English in rural Indian classrooms: A critical perspective. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(1), 29–44.
- Deshpande, R. (2013). Parental involvement and language learning in rural contexts. Educational Review, 65(3), 312–329.
- Gandhi, M., & Joshi, P. (2012). Post‐liberalization trends in English instruction. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(14), 56–62.
- Kamble, S. (2012). Community perspectives on English education: A case study from Maharashtra. Research in Education, 88(1), 45–53.
- Kulkarni, N., & Patankar, S. (2011). Teacher preparedness for English‐Medium Instruction in rural India. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 755–762.
- Kumar, R., & Rao, V. (2009). Language policy and educational practice in India. Language Policy, 8(3), 227–243.
- Mehta, D. (2015). Bilingual pedagogy in rural schools: Effects on language maintenance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(2), 345–352.
- Ministry of Education. (2001). Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan: Framework for implementation. Government of India Press.
- Patil, R. (2008). EMI and student achievement in semi‐urban schools. Indian Journal of Educational Studies, 13(2), 112–120.
- Sarkar, T. (2007). Cultural implications of English education in Marathi medium schools. Cultural Studies in Education, 3(1), 15–28.
- Sharma, L., & Singh, R. (2015). Resource allocation for EMI in rural schools. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 29(1), 27–40.
- Shinde, A. (2014). Classroom strategies and challenges in EMI schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 34, 56–64.
- Srinivas, T. (2008). Longitudinal effects of EMI on academic performance. Indian Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 209–226.
- Gupta, M. (2002). English language acquisition and identity. Language and Society, 31(4), 567–589.
- Joshi, K., & Sharma, P. (2011). Comparative study of bijective vs. monolingual teaching methods. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 237–254.
- Kulkarni, R. (2005). Marathi retention in EMI contexts. South Asian Language Studies, 9, 101–118.
- Patankar, V., & Desai, M. (2010). Teacher training for English instruction: Evaluating outcomes. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(4), 83–98.
- Rao, S. (2004). Language anxiety in multilingual classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 215–234.
- Srinivas, K., & Kulkarni, P. (2013). Socioeconomic factors in rural education. Journal of Rural Studies, 31, 75–82.
- Sharma, V. (2007). Bilingual education policy analysis. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 15(17), 1–23.